Yes. Elicit has a free plan or free tier. Paid plans add more usage and features.

How much does Elicit cost?

Elicit's paid plans: Basic: Free; Pro: $49/user/month, billed $588 annually; Scale: $229/user/month, billed $2,748 annually; Enterprise: Custom (talk to sales). Prices were taken from the official pricing page; check it for the current offer.

What is Elicit best for?

People use Elicit for running systematic and scoping literature reviews, preparing thesis or grant background research, assessing prior clinical trials in pharma R&D, building evidence bases for policy decisions.

Which platforms does Elicit support?

Elicit is available on API, Web.

What are some alternatives to Elicit?

Similar tools include Anara, Yomu AI, Logically, Jenni. See the Alternatives section to compare them.

Elicit

Elicit searches 138M+ academic papers, writes cited research reports and automates systematic review screening and data extraction for researchers, students and R&D teams.

What is Elicit?

Elicit is an AI research assistant built for working with scientific literature. It searches a large index of academic papers and clinical trials, summarizes findings, extracts data into tables and drafts cited research reports. Rather than answering from general knowledge like a chatbot, Elicit grounds its claims in source papers and links each statement to the sentence it came from.

Its users include academic researchers, students, pharmaceutical and medical-device teams, policy analysts and R&D groups in industry who need to understand what the evidence says before making decisions.

Key Features of Elicit

Semantic paper search

Elicit searches more than 138 million academic papers and about 545,000 clinical trials. Because the search understands meaning, you can ask a research question in plain language instead of guessing exact keywords.

Research reports

Reports follow a process modeled on systematic reviews: Elicit finds relevant papers, extracts key information and writes a structured brief. You can change which papers and which data points the report covers.

Systematic literature review workflow

For formal reviews, Elicit automates screening and data extraction across thousands of papers, with partial support for search and report writing. The company says researchers report time savings of up to 80%.

Research Agent

The Research Agent gathers evidence from academic databases, public data and your own uploaded documents, then produces cited reports, tables, figures, analyses or slides for higher-stakes questions.

Library, Routines and API

A shared library stores sources for reuse, Routines keep monitoring new research and update your work, and an API plus MCP server let teams connect Elicit to their own agents and tools.

Elicit Pricing

Elicit offers a free tier and paid per-user plans in US dollars. The prices below are the annual-billing rates shown for the Industry option on the pricing page; monthly billing is also available. Usage for the Research Agent, Reports and systematic reviews comes from a monthly allowance that grows with each plan.

Prices checked on October 27, 2026; check the official pricing page for current plans.

Who Should Use Elicit?

Elicit is aimed at anyone who regularly reviews academic literature: graduate students preparing a thesis, academics running systematic or scoping reviews, medical writers, pharmaceutical teams assessing prior trials, and policy researchers building an evidence base. Industry R&D teams can use it to scan studies on materials, devices or algorithms before starting new work.

Is Elicit Worth It?

For literature-heavy work, Elicit is one of the more specialized AI tools available. Sentence-level citations, structured data extraction and a dedicated systematic review workflow address the main weaknesses of general chatbots for research, and the free tier with unlimited search and summaries is useful on its own.

The paid plans are expensive for individuals, especially Scale at more than $200 per user per month, and the most advanced usage limits sit on higher tiers. Its coverage centers on academic papers and trials, so it is less suited to questions that depend on news, market data or grey literature. AI-extracted data should still be checked against the original papers before it goes into a publication. Researchers who screen or extract from many papers will likely find the Pro plan pays for itself; occasional users can stay on Basic.